Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maxime Janvier vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Janvier vs Damm analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxime Janvier vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Janvier 0 - 0 Damm
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Janvier has won 46.51% of points on his second serve, while Damm has won 48.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Janvier, in recent form, has won 45.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damm has won 45.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.56% and 26.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Janvier has saved 57.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damm has saved 71.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Janvier has won 49.4% of matches played (W/L 41/ 42), with Damm winning 65.43% (W/L 53/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Janvier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 182/ 155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Janvier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.78% of matches (W/L 30/ 37), where as Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Janvier has played against opponents with an average rank of 291.39 while Damm has played against players with an average rank of 264.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Janvier has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damm has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Janvier has converted 41.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damm has converted 35.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Janvier 0 - 0 Damm
217
Rank
170
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
179
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
52% (352-331)
Career Total W/L
57% (135-102)
45% (14-17)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$157,145
Career Prize Money
$107,985
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maxime Janvier | Martin Damm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (14/17) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (34/44) | 49% (30/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (372/397) | 50% (322/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 1.1 |
| Aces Total | 161 | 346 |
| DFs per game | 0.58 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 219 | 116 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:4 | 1:49:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.71 | 336.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1393/2420) | 59% (1235/2093) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1012/1393) | 77% (956/1235) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (482/1027) | 48% (416/858) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (82/194) | 35% (46/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (886/2420) | 33% (663/1987) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 35% (8/15) | 55% (11/9) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (14/30) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 45% (9/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 65% (11/17) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 39% (23/9) | 20% (15/3) |
Maxime Janvier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Maxime Janvier
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Maxime Janvier
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Maxime Janvier
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
10
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Patrick Kypson
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Maxime Janvier
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
7 of
7)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Maxime Janvier
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
26
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
100%
(
40 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
7 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
81 of
117)
18
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
55 of
81)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Janvier Vs Damm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
